![](https://worldnewsradar.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BANNER-RENT-300X47-COLUMN-1.png"){kind=small}
Every modern American president has harbored the belief that they could reshape global affairs, but Donald Trump’s approach is defined by an unparalleled confidence in his ability to control world events through personal dominance. Despite this, his attempts to impose his will on powerful global players are consistently met with resistance, signaling that his vision of unilateral leadership may not align with the complex and sovereign interests of other nations.
I. Trump’s Assertive Foreign Policy Approach
1. Overestimating Influence on Russia
Trump has repeatedly claimed to maintain a strong personal rapport with Russian President Vladimir Putin, yet his efforts to influence Moscow have largely backfired. Putin continues to disregard U.S. diplomatic efforts to resolve the Ukraine conflict, and Russian media portrays Trump as a leader who talks tough but lacks follow-through. Instead of projecting strength, Trump’s inability to enforce consequences has undermined his credibility on the world stage.
2. Misreading China’s Political Landscape
Believing he could steer China’s economic decisions through tariffs and bold rhetoric, Trump underestimated the internal mechanics of Beijing’s governance. Chinese President Xi Jinping, operating under a tightly controlled authoritarian regime, is politically unable to show submission to U.S. pressure. U.S. officials now express disappointment over China’s reluctance to fulfill trade de-escalation promises, revealing the limitations of Trump’s strategy.
II. Diplomatic Missteps in Europe and the Middle East
1. Tariff Tensions with the European Union
Trump’s confrontation with the European Union mirrored his dealings with China. He initiated a trade war only to withdraw without achieving substantial gains. The term “TACO trade” — short for “Trump Always Chickens Out” — coined by Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong, encapsulates the criticism that Trump lacks the stamina to follow through on his aggressive economic threats.
2. Complex Ties with Israel
Trump initially aligned closely with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, offering considerable support during his first term. However, his attempt to mediate peace in the Middle East has since clashed with Netanyahu’s interests in prolonging the Gaza conflict. Moreover, Trump’s aspiration to renegotiate a nuclear deal with Iran runs counter to Israel’s strategic goals of disabling Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, complicating diplomatic relations.
III. Challenges from Other Global Leaders
1. Declining Respect from African and Ukrainian Leaders
Trump’s heavy-handed diplomacy has alienated several leaders, including South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Both were publicly humiliated during visits to the White House, signaling a diminishing allure of U.S. influence. World leaders are increasingly unwilling to be swayed by overt displays of power without tangible incentives.
2. Global Leaders Follow Their Own Paths
Many powerful nations are pursuing national interests based on historical context, internal dynamics, and strategic calculations. These agendas often diverge significantly from the transactional and short-term expectations of the Trump administration. As such, appeals lacking mutual benefits are unlikely to succeed in this increasingly multipolar world.
IV. The Myth of Personal Diplomacy
1. Campaign Promises Versus Reality
On the campaign trail, Trump frequently touted his personal relationships with figures like Putin and Xi as solutions to deep-seated international problems. However, his overconfidence in personal diplomacy has yielded few results, as these global leaders continue to prioritize their own national agendas.
2. Not Alone in Delusion
Trump is not the first president to overestimate the power of personality in diplomacy. George W. Bush famously claimed to have seen Putin’s soul, while Barack Obama once dismissed Russia as a fading regional power. Both assessments failed to recognize Putin’s enduring geopolitical ambitions, as seen in the annexation of Crimea and Russia’s expanding influence.
V. A Pattern Among 21st Century Presidents
1. Bush’s Unintended Global Policing
George W. Bush entered office determined to scale back American interventionism. However, the 9/11 attacks redirected his presidency toward global military engagement. While the U.S. initially achieved military success in Afghanistan and Iraq, the inability to maintain peace in the aftermath defined the ultimate failure of those campaigns.
2. Obama’s Hope for a Reset
President Obama’s early foreign policy was shaped by a desire to mend ties strained by the War on Terror. His 2009 speech in Cairo promised a new beginning with the Muslim world, based on mutual respect and understanding. However, his charisma alone was not enough to transform decades of geopolitical mistrust or to foster lasting change.
3. Biden’s Global Reassurance Falters
When Joe Biden entered office, he reassured allies that “America is back.” But his tenure saw a retreat from this globalist vision, especially following his controversial decision to seek reelection. As a result, the international version of the United States — committed to multilateralism and global stability — began to fade again, while Trump regained political momentum.
VI. America First and the Erosion of Influence
1. Populist Rhetoric Versus Global Reality
Trump’s “America First” message asserts that the U.S. has long been exploited by its allies and trade partners. This narrative overlooks how American leadership and participation in shaping global capitalism helped establish the country’s historical dominance. By rejecting international cooperation in favor of unilateral action, Trump risks undoing decades of strategic advantage.
2. The Decline of Soft Power
Trump’s approach to diplomacy — driven by threats, tariffs, and isolationist rhetoric — has weakened the United States’ soft power, which historically enabled it to lead by example rather than coercion. His first few months in office were marked by controversial proposals, including the expansion of U.S. territories into Canada and Greenland, and cuts to humanitarian aid. These moves have sent a clear message: the world no longer views America as the sole authority.
Conclusion
Donald Trump’s foreign policy rests on a belief that the U.S. can dictate the course of world events through sheer willpower and personal charisma. But international relations are not shaped by one man’s ego. The resistance from leaders in Russia, China, the European Union, Israel, and beyond reflects a growing realization that America’s ability to command the world is not what it once was. The future of diplomacy will depend less on bravado and more on mutual respect, strategic negotiation, and long-term vision.
