![](https://worldnewsradar.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BANNER-RENT-300X47-COLUMN-1.png"){kind=small}
In a move that has ignited widespread criticism, Russia has formally recognised the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afghanistan, four years after the group seized control of Kabul. The decision marks a significant diplomatic milestone for the Taliban regime, yet sparks serious concerns among opposition figures, women’s rights advocates, and international observers.
I. Russia’s Recognition of the Taliban
1. A Bold Diplomatic Move
On Thursday, Russian Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi welcomed Moscow’s decision, calling it a “courageous” step and a fresh start for “positive relations, mutual respect, and constructive engagement.” He expressed hope that other nations would follow suit, despite persistent global reluctance. Russia’s foreign ministry echoed this sentiment, outlining plans for collaboration in energy, transport, agriculture, and infrastructure, as well as continued support in counter-terrorism and anti-drug efforts.
2. Continuity in Diplomatic Engagement
Unlike most countries that withdrew their diplomatic presence after the Taliban takeover in 2021, Russia notably kept its embassy operational in Kabul. It also entered into a key economic agreement in 2022 to supply oil, gas, and wheat to Afghanistan. Earlier in April, Russia removed the Taliban from its list of terrorist organisations, and President Vladimir Putin described the group as an “ally” in combating terrorism as early as mid-2023. Bilateral contacts between Russia and the Taliban date back to 2018.
II. Domestic and International Backlash
1. Opposition Voices Speak Out
Prominent opposition voices have strongly denounced Russia’s move. Former Afghan legislator Fawzia Koofi warned that recognising the Taliban threatens global security and legitimises their impunity. The Afghan Women’s Political Participation Network called it a validation of an authoritarian, anti-women regime undermining basic civil rights. Dr Rangin Dadfar Spanta, former national security adviser, called the decision “regrettable” and predicted it would encourage other nations to follow Russia.
2. Echoes of the Soviet Invasion
Critics also pointed to Russia’s history in Afghanistan. The Soviet invasion of 1979, which led to a nine-year occupation and the installation of a puppet regime, remains fresh in Afghan memory. The Women’s Participation Network accused Russia of repeating past destructive tactics, now cloaked in diplomacy, drawing a direct line between Moscow’s past military aggression and the current normalization of the Taliban.
III. Taliban Policies and Human Rights Concerns
1. System of Religious Law and Women’s Restrictions
Since returning to power, the Taliban have imposed Sharia-based governance that severely curtails women’s rights. Girls older than 12 are barred from schools, women have been banned from many forms of employment, travel is restricted without male companions, and women’s public speech is tightly regulated. Despite Taliban assurances that these policies align with Afghan culture and Islam, the United Nations and human rights groups describe them as “gender apartheid,” documenting brutal punishments and attacks on former officials.
2. Sanctions and Security Worries
Following the Taliban’s takeover in 2021, the UN Security Council imposed strict sanctions on Afghanistan, including freezing around $9 billion in assets. UN rights monitors continue to oppose any deportations to Afghanistan due to ongoing human rights violations, despite Germany’s Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt proposing bilateral agreements to reinstate deportations of convicted Afghan nationals.
IV. Global Diplomatic Landscape
1. Limited Recognition Beyond Moscow
Despite Russia’s formal recognition, most countries have refused to establish full diplomatic ties with the Taliban. Embassies in Kabul have mostly been closed, save for those from China, the UAE, Uzbekistan, and Pakistan, all of which maintain designated ambassadors. European nations remain notably cautious, balancing humanitarian engagement with international pressure to uphold human rights.
2. Germany’s Controversial Stand
Germany has stirred debate by suggesting direct negotiations with the Taliban to enable deportations. However, the UN Human Rights Office responded that returning people to Afghanistan remains “not appropriate” given documented violations, reflecting broader international unease.
V. Regional and Strategic Implications
1. Russia’s Strategic Calculus
Observers view Russia’s move as part of its broader geopolitical strategy to expand influence in Central Asia. By backing the Taliban, Moscow may seek a foothold to counter Western influence in the region, strengthen economic partnerships, and assert dominance over energy routes and infrastructure projects.
2. Ripple Effects on Other Governments
Analysts suggest that Russia’s precedent could embolden other nations to normalise the Taliban, particularly as they face their own strategic interests. However, critics argue that consummating diplomatic recognition without reforms risks tolerating a regime that violates international humanitarian and human rights norms.
VI. The Path Ahead for Afghanistan
1. Conditional Engagement vs. Recognition
While formal recognition by countries such as China and Pakistan has not followed, calls persist for conditional engagement: offering humanitarian aid and targeted cooperation in exchange for concrete improvements in women’s freedoms and civil liberties. The Taliban’s willingness to alter current policies will likely shape future diplomatic relationships.
2. Strengthening International Oversight
Human rights groups urge the UN and allied nations to prioritise closer monitoring and reporting mechanisms. They insist future aid should be tied to verifiable progress in women’s rights, education access, and the rule of law.
Conclusion
Russia’s formal recognition of the Taliban regime is a historic and controversial step that could redefine Afghanistan’s global standing. While potential economic and security benefits underpin Moscow’s decision, the move draws fierce critique for empowering an oppressive government and recalling memories of Russia’s previous military interventions. As Moscow forges ahead, the international community faces a critical moment: to confront or engage a regime that remains fundamentally antagonistic to core human rights principles.
