![](https://worldnewsradar.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BANNER-RENT-300X47-COLUMN-1.png"){kind=small}
After years of bold promises and mounting anticipation, Tesla has finally introduced its robotaxi service to the public—albeit in a limited form. Launched in Austin, Texas, the driverless ride-hailing system was unveiled on 22 June with great fanfare from Elon Musk and support from Tesla’s online community. But as videos from the event began circulating, it quickly became clear that the rollout wasn’t as smooth as hoped. While the stock market initially responded positively, the service has since drawn regulatory scrutiny and sparked concerns about the readiness of Tesla’s self-driving technology.
I. A Promising Launch Meets Technical Setbacks
1. Influencer-Fueled Debut
Tesla’s robotaxi service went live with about ten vehicles operating within a restricted area of Austin. The rides, priced at $4.20—a nod to Musk’s infamous humor—were offered to select influencers who shared glowing first impressions online. Musk celebrated the rollout as a success, and Tesla’s stock surged nearly 10% the following day. However, these same videos soon revealed erratic driving behavior, including lane confusion, unexpected stops, and traffic law violations.
2. Regulatory Attention Follows
The footage did not go unnoticed. By Tuesday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) had launched an investigation, reaching out to Tesla for additional details. One video captured a robotaxi failing to complete a left turn and entering oncoming traffic before correcting its course. Other clips showed vehicles exceeding speed limits or dropping passengers off in unsafe locations, prompting serious safety concerns.
II. The Technology Behind Tesla’s Robotaxis
1. Camera-Only Approach
Tesla’s robotaxi fleet relies entirely on cameras, a decision Musk has staunchly defended. Unlike competitors such as Waymo and Zoox, which use a combination of cameras, radar, and lidar, Tesla believes cameras alone can replicate human driving capabilities. Musk argues that since humans rely on vision to drive, so should machines, making additional sensors both expensive and unnecessary.
2. The Debate Over Lidar and Radar
Musk’s opposition to lidar is well documented. At a 2019 Tesla autonomy event, he famously said, “Lidar is lame… It’s friggin’ stupid.” While lidar technology can cost around $12,000 per vehicle, cameras are significantly cheaper—about $400 per car. However, critics argue that relying solely on cameras leaves the system vulnerable in poor lighting or bad weather, factors that radar and lidar are better equipped to handle.
III. Tesla’s Autonomy Vision Versus Reality
1. Years of Delayed Promises
Since at least 2016, Musk has proclaimed that Tesla vehicles would soon be fully autonomous. But nearly a decade later, the rollout in Austin remains tightly controlled, requiring safety drivers and operating only under favorable conditions. The launch, while notable, still falls far short of the widespread robotaxi revolution Musk envisioned.
2. Ongoing Lawsuits and Fatal Crashes
Tesla’s camera-only strategy has led to a number of high-profile crashes. According to a Washington Post investigation, at least 736 accidents and 17 deaths have been linked to Tesla’s full self-driving technology. Lawsuits accuse the company of negligence, claiming the software struggles with common environmental challenges like fog, sun glare, and darkness.
Attorney Brett Schreiber, representing multiple families affected by Tesla-related crashes, criticized Musk’s approach: “Tesla continues to have this fetishistic view that it’s going to operate its system solely on cameras, despite every intelligent human being in this entire space saying that can’t be done.”
IV. Comparing Tesla to Waymo: Two Diverging Paths
1. Cautious, Methodical Progress
Waymo, a subsidiary of Alphabet (Google’s parent company), is widely seen as the frontrunner in the autonomous driving space. Unlike Tesla, Waymo has spent years mapping cities and rigorously testing vehicles before public deployment. In San Francisco, Waymo began trials in 2021 and only launched its commercial service in 2024. This deliberate rollout strategy has helped the company minimize risk, although even Waymo has faced its share of setbacks, including a recall of over 1,200 vehicles earlier this year.
2. Tesla’s Fast-Track Tactics
In contrast, Tesla’s approach appears more impulsive. The company did not seek a permit for the robotaxi launch in Austin, partly because Texas has no formal process for such approvals until later this year. This mirrors Uber’s 2016 self-driving launch in San Francisco, which ended in regulatory backlash after a vehicle ran a red light on its first day. Tesla’s emphasis on speed and spectacle may impress investors, but it leaves little room for caution and refinement.
V. The Road Ahead for Tesla’s Robotaxi Program
1. Pushing Forward Despite Challenges
Despite the current hiccups, Musk remains undeterred. He continues to amplify praise for the service on social media while downplaying the ongoing investigation. Some videos highlight moments of success, such as a robotaxi stopping to let a peacock cross the road, reinforcing the narrative that Tesla’s AI is capable of handling real-world unpredictability.
2. Bridging the Technology Gap
To truly compete with more established autonomous driving systems, Tesla must demonstrate not only innovation but also reliability and safety. While Musk insists that Tesla’s system can be deployed anywhere without the need for expensive hardware or detailed city mapping, the inconsistencies seen in Austin suggest the company has some catching up to do.
3. A Question of Priorities
Tesla’s reliance on a camera-only model may help it scale more affordably, but it may also be the very factor holding it back. Experts argue that combining radar, lidar, and cameras—the so-called “holy trinity” of collision avoidance—offers a more comprehensive and dependable solution, especially in unpredictable urban environments.
Conclusion
Tesla’s robotaxi debut in Austin was meant to showcase the culmination of years of research and investment in autonomous vehicles. While the launch generated buzz and boosted stock prices, the real-world performance exposed technical flaws and raised safety concerns. Elon Musk’s commitment to a camera-only system continues to shape Tesla’s strategy, but whether this path can deliver truly reliable self-driving remains to be seen. As the NHTSA and the public scrutinize Tesla’s next moves, the future of robotaxis will hinge on striking the right balance between innovation and responsibility.
