![](https://worldnewsradar.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BANNER-RENT-300X47-COLUMN-1.png"){kind=small}
In recent months, DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence startup that once claimed its technology could rival ChatGPT at a significantly lower cost, has become the subject of growing international concern. Although the company has made headlines for its rapid technological advancements, it is now under intense examination by multiple governments due to its data storage policies and security practices. According to DeepSeek’s privacy policy, personal data such as AI-generated queries and uploaded files are stored on servers located in China. This has raised red flags globally, particularly in countries wary of potential data misuse and surveillance. Here’s a look at how different nations are responding to the company’s expanding influence and practices.
I. Global Reactions to DeepSeek’s Data Practices
1. Australia: Full Government Ban
In early February, Australia took swift action by banning DeepSeek from all government devices. Officials expressed deep concerns about the app’s potential to compromise national security. The decision reflects Australia’s increasing caution towards foreign AI technologies that may expose sensitive government data to external threats.
2. Germany: Push for App Store Removal
Germany’s data protection authorities have formally requested that Apple and Google remove DeepSeek from their platforms. The move, initiated in June, stems from unresolved issues related to user data safety. German regulators are demanding transparency from DeepSeek regarding how it handles and protects the personal data of European users.
II. Asia’s Firm Stance on AI and Privacy
1. India: Advisory Against Official Use
India’s Ministry of Finance, acting in early February, advised its personnel to refrain from using AI tools—including DeepSeek and ChatGPT—for official purposes. The ministry cited the risk of confidential government documents being exposed to foreign entities, emphasizing the need for tighter control over digital tools used within government operations.
2. Italy: Investigation and Temporary Ban
Italy’s antitrust agency, AGCM, opened an investigation into DeepSeek in mid-June, probing whether the company adequately informs users that its AI outputs may contain false or misleading information. Earlier in January, Italy had already blocked the app due to a lack of clear communication about its data usage policies.
3. Russia: Embracing Collaboration
While many countries are pulling back, Russia appears to be going in a different direction. In February, President Vladimir Putin directed Sberbank—Russia’s largest state-owned bank—to collaborate with Chinese researchers on joint AI ventures. This move suggests Russia is not only willing to work with DeepSeek but is also eager to harness its technology for national innovation.
III. South Korea and Taiwan: Precaution and Reassessment
1. South Korea: Temporary Suspension and Reinstatement
South Korea’s data protection authority temporarily halted new downloads of the DeepSeek app in mid-February after it was found that the company had failed to fully comply with privacy guidelines. The country’s industry ministry also restricted employee access to the app as a precaution. However, following compliance improvements, access was restored by late April.
2. Taiwan: Comprehensive Government Ban
Taiwan took a decisive step in February by banning DeepSeek from all government departments, labeling the service a national security risk. Taiwanese authorities also voiced concerns over potential censorship and the possibility of sensitive data being transferred to Chinese servers without users’ consent.
IV. Europe and the U.S.: Strategic Evaluations and Warnings
1. Netherlands: Investigation and Public Warning
At the end of January, the Netherlands’ privacy watchdog announced a formal investigation into DeepSeek’s data collection practices. Government officials issued a public warning advising Dutch citizens to be cautious when using the application. Additionally, civil servants were barred from installing or using DeepSeek, citing concerns over foreign cyber-influence.
2. United States: Considering Sanctions and Restrictions
In April, reports emerged that the Trump administration is evaluating potential penalties against DeepSeek. Measures under consideration include blocking the company’s access to U.S. technology and prohibiting American users from engaging with its services. These actions are part of broader efforts to limit the influence of foreign AI firms suspected of compromising national data security.
Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for AI Expansion
DeepSeek’s global journey reveals the complex intersection of innovation, geopolitics, and digital ethics. While the startup has demonstrated significant technological promise, the mounting international backlash highlights a crucial issue: trust. Governments across the world are demanding higher standards of transparency, accountability, and compliance when it comes to handling sensitive data—especially when that data may cross borders. The growing scrutiny of DeepSeek serves as a powerful reminder that in the AI age, technological advancement must go hand-in-hand with ethical responsibility and respect for international privacy norms.
