![](https://worldnewsradar.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BANNER-RENT-300X47-COLUMN-1.png"){kind=small}
Imagine if your private AI queries—ranging from math help to deeply personal identity questions—suddenly became visible to everyone online. That’s exactly the concern surrounding Meta AI, the artificial intelligence tool developed by Meta, which has been quietly displaying user prompts and results on a public “Discover” feed. Though Meta claims users are informed before their inputs are made public, many may not realize their personal or even sensitive data is being exposed—sometimes with identifying usernames and profile pictures attached.
I. Meta AI and the Public Feed Dilemma
1. Prompts Accidentally Made Public
Meta AI, which is integrated across popular platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, allows users to interact with generative AI technology. While the service is designed with a public-facing “Discover” section to showcase how people are using it, the actual visibility of personal queries has alarmed privacy experts.
The feed displays user conversations with the AI, including the original prompt and its response. Some users unknowingly share posts containing personal information or sensitive topics, such as academic cheating, intimate identity exploration, or requests for suggestive content involving animated or anthropomorphic characters.
2. A Misleading User Experience
Though Meta includes a warning stating, “Prompts you post are public and visible to everyone,” many users appear unaware of this by default. The BBC discovered several posts that revealed usernames and profile images, making it possible to trace these conversations back to actual social media accounts. Cybersecurity experts say this disconnect between user expectations and the platform’s behavior poses serious concerns.
II. Real-World Examples Raise Alarms
1. Inadvertent Academic Cheating
One concerning trend is students uploading photos of school or university test questions to Meta AI, asking for answers. Some of these interactions were publicly accessible, with titles such as “Generative AI tackles math problems with ease.” This not only raises ethical issues but also questions the effectiveness of Meta’s privacy controls in educational settings.
2. Gender Identity and Personal Exploration
Another example involved a user exploring questions related to gender identity, including whether they should transition. Such sensitive discussions being publicly posted without full user awareness could lead to emotional distress, social stigma, or even discrimination if traced back to their real identity.
3. Explicit Content Generation
The public feed also included prompts requesting the AI to generate scantily-clad female or animal characters. In one case, a user with an identifiable Instagram handle asked Meta AI to create an image of a character wearing only underwear while lying outdoors. This raises not only ethical questions but also concerns about the AI’s content moderation capabilities and the visibility of such prompts in a public domain.
III. Meta’s Position on User Control
1. Official Statement and Public Feed Design
When launching Meta AI, the company emphasized that the Discover feed would allow people to share and explore AI usage creatively. Meta insists that chats are private by default and that no content is shared unless users choose to post it. Additionally, the company noted that users can later remove anything they’ve made public.
However, the system appears to be less intuitive than advertised. The act of “choosing” to post a prompt may not be fully understood by users who assume AI chat behavior mirrors more private experiences, like those with virtual assistants or traditional chatbots.
2. Adjusting Privacy Settings
Users can opt to make their AI interactions private via their account settings. But again, the process is not always immediately apparent. The lack of clear instructions or visible defaults makes it easy for users to unintentionally share private information, believing their queries are visible only to them.
IV. Expert Reactions and Warnings
1. A Serious UX and Security Concern
Rachel Tobac, CEO of Social Proof Security, criticized Meta’s approach, stating on X (formerly Twitter) that the platform suffers from a “huge user experience and security problem.” According to her, users do not typically expect chatbot interactions to appear in public social media feeds.
This confusion means many are unintentionally sharing personal content, unaware their identities are tied to the public posts. Tobac argues that platforms should be designed in a way that user expectations align with the actual functionality—especially when dealing with sensitive data.
2. The Need for Transparent AI Interfaces
Experts agree that AI tools should include clearer explanations about privacy settings and how data is used or displayed. The current structure of Meta AI leaves too much room for misinterpretation, which could damage user trust and increase exposure to online risks. A transparent onboarding process and proactive privacy controls could go a long way in preventing these incidents.
V. Future of AI and Public Data: What’s at Stake?
1. Balancing Innovation with Responsibility
Meta’s vision for a collaborative AI space, where users can learn from each other’s prompts, is not inherently flawed. However, failing to safeguard the privacy and consent of those users jeopardizes that vision. While public AI prompts could offer learning value, they must be curated and anonymized to avoid exposing individuals’ personal or potentially compromising information.
2. Encouraging Responsible Use
Meta must lead by example in how it manages AI interactions across its vast social ecosystem. Users should be given tools that are not only powerful but also secure by default. Privacy settings should be accessible, understandable, and respected—not buried under layers of complexity or vague warnings.
As generative AI tools become more integrated into everyday digital life, the lines between private interaction and public sharing must be made clearer. Companies like Meta have a responsibility to ensure their users are fully informed and protected when engaging with these evolving technologies.
Conclusion
Meta AI offers users an exciting new way to explore creativity, solve problems, and seek answers. However, its current public-sharing model has opened the door to privacy concerns and unintended exposure of sensitive information. While Meta maintains that users are in control, experts argue that many do not fully understand how their prompts may be made visible—and traceable—online. As AI continues to shape digital interactions, transparency and user trust must be prioritized. Ensuring that privacy expectations align with platform behavior will be critical in creating ethical and secure AI experiences for all.
