![](https://worldnewsradar.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/BANNER-RENT-300X47-COLUMN-1.png"){kind=small}
Over three decades after the devastating 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people, Argentina has taken a historic step by ordering a trial in absentia for ten Iranian and Lebanese nationals suspected of involvement in the attack. This decision seeks to bring some measure of justice and uncover the truth behind one of Latin America’s deadliest acts of terrorism.
I. The AMIA Bombing and Its Legacy
1. The 1994 Attack and Its Impact
On July 18, 1994, a truck loaded with explosives was detonated at the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association (AMIA) building in Buenos Aires. The blast killed 85 individuals and injured over 300, making it the deadliest attack in Argentina’s history. The bombing left deep scars on the country’s Jewish community and remains a painful symbol of unresolved terror. Despite extensive investigations, no arrests have been made, and no group has claimed responsibility.
2. Suspicions and Accusations
Argentina and Israel have long suspected the involvement of Hezbollah, the Lebanese Shiite militant group, acting on Iran’s orders. The ten suspects named in the case include former Iranian and Lebanese officials, diplomats, and ministers, for whom Argentina has issued international arrest warrants. Notably, among those accused was former Iranian president Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, who passed away in 2017. Iran has consistently denied any involvement and has refused to extradite the suspects.
II. Judicial Developments and Trial in Absentia
1. Legal Innovation in Argentina
Judge Daniel Rafecas’s recent ruling to proceed with a trial in absentia is unprecedented in Argentina. Until March 2025, Argentine law required suspects to be physically present for trial, but new legislation now permits trials without defendants when their presence cannot be secured. Rafecas justified the decision due to the “material impossibility” of apprehending the suspects and the severe nature of the crime classified as a crime against humanity.
2. The Trial’s Purpose and Challenges
The judge emphasized that holding a trial in absentia offers a chance to reconstruct the events and pursue justice despite obstacles. The case’s exceptional nature stems from its longevity, the complexity of international involvement, and ongoing political sensitivities. The trial is intended to keep the investigation alive and provide answers to victims’ families.
3. Political Support and Renewed Efforts
The trial comes amid a recent surge in political will to address the bombing, notably supported by President Javier Milei, an outspoken ally of Israel. This new push for justice also follows an Argentine court ruling in April 2024 attributing responsibility to Hezbollah and labeling the attack a “crime against humanity.” The court linked the attack to geopolitical tensions after the Argentine government canceled nuclear contracts with Iran during Carlos Menem’s presidency, although direct evidence implicating Iran was not produced.
III. Broader Context and Ongoing Controversies
1. Previous Investigations and Criticism
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled in 2024 that the Argentine state failed to prevent or adequately investigate the AMIA bombing. The court also accused Argentina of attempts to obstruct the inquiry and cover up key facts, which has fueled public distrust. The slow pace of justice has compounded the tragedy for victims’ families and the Jewish community.
2. Political Implications and Accusations
Former Argentine president Cristina Fernández de Kirchner has been ordered to face trial related to a controversial 2013 memorandum signed with Iran. The memorandum sought to facilitate cooperation on investigating the bombing but was widely criticized as a cover-up that allowed suspects to be interrogated in Iran rather than Argentina. Fernández faces charges of conspiring with Tehran to obstruct justice.
Conclusion
More than thirty years after the AMIA bombing shook Argentina, the decision to hold a trial in absentia marks a pivotal moment in the pursuit of justice for one of Latin America’s deadliest terrorist attacks. Despite the challenges of prosecuting suspects who remain abroad, Argentina’s legal system is forging ahead in its efforts to uncover the truth and hold perpetrators accountable. The trial also highlights broader issues of state accountability, international law, and the lasting impact of geopolitical conflicts on national security.
